YouTube reviewer Angry Joe just gave Battlefield 6 a 6 out of 10 while praising it as having the best gameplay in the entire Battlefield franchise and infinite potential to become the greatest entry in the series. If that sounds contradictory, welcome to the bizarre reality of Battlefield 6, a game that launched on October 10, 2025 to both massive success and widespread confusion about whether it actually succeeded or failed.
The review perfectly captures the split personality of this release. Battlefield 6 sold over 7 million copies in three days, peaked at nearly 750,000 concurrent players on Steam, and currently sits at an 83 Metacritic score. By most metrics, that’s a hit. Yet the conversation around it feels weirdly negative, with some corners of the internet declaring it flopped despite those impressive numbers.
What Angry Joe Actually Said
According to Reddit discussions summarizing the review, Joe rated Battlefield 6 a 6 out of 10 for its current state, but suggested its potential future score could reach anywhere from 7 to 9 out of 10 depending on how DICE handles post-launch support. He described the gameplay itself as the finest in Battlefield history, with combat mechanics, destruction physics, and moment-to-moment action surpassing even beloved entries like Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4.
So why the middling score? The problems lie everywhere except the core shooting and vehicle combat. User interface issues make simple tasks like spawning or navigating menus unnecessarily complicated. The progression system feels grindy and poorly balanced. Weapon unlock challenges are absurdly difficult, with some requiring tasks so specific and frustrating that players are using custom Portal matches just to cheese them. The single-player campaign is reportedly basic and forgettable.
Joe’s review essentially argues that DICE nailed the hardest part, making Battlefield feel incredible to play, but fumbled nearly everything surrounding that experience. It’s a frustrating situation where the foundation is rock solid but the structure built on top of it keeps getting in the way.
Lower Score Than Call of Duty
What really got the community talking is that Joe gave Call of Duty Black Ops 6 a 7 out of 10, scoring it higher than Battlefield 6. For a channel known for preferring Battlefield over Call of Duty historically, that’s significant. It suggests the issues with Battlefield 6 genuinely hurt the overall experience enough to drop it below its primary competitor, despite having superior moment-to-moment gameplay.
Fans in Reddit threads expressed mixed feelings about this. Some agreed that the surrounding systems are bad enough to warrant the lower score. Others felt Joe was being too harsh, pointing out that the core gameplay should count for more when evaluating a multiplayer-focused shooter. The debate essentially boils down to how much you value a perfect shooting experience versus a well-rounded complete package.
This scoring discrepancy matters because it reflects a larger conversation happening across the gaming community. Is Battlefield 6 good? The answer depends entirely on what you’re measuring. The actual combat when you’re running across a map capturing objectives with your squad? Phenomenal. Everything you do before and after those moments? Frustrating.
The Weapon Challenge Controversy
One specific issue highlighted in both Joe’s review and broader community discussions involves weapon unlock challenges. To access 12 of the 41 primary weapons in Battlefield 6, players must complete assignments that range from tedious to borderline impossible. According to Polygon, one particularly egregious example requires players to suppress 300 enemies and deal 10,000 hipfire damage with LMGs.
The problem is that suppression mechanics in Battlefield 6 are weaker than previous games, only counting if you miss multiple shots near an enemy. Hipfiring an LMG is wildly inaccurate and only effective at close range, exactly where you wouldn’t want to use an LMG. Players on Reddit described wanting to gouge their eyes out while attempting these challenges, with some resorting to custom Portal matches where they can manipulate conditions to complete tasks more easily.
These aren’t side objectives for cosmetics. These are gates keeping actual weapons behind requirements that feel designed without consideration for how people actually play Battlefield. It’s emblematic of the disconnect between the excellent core gameplay and the systems wrapped around it.
Back to Battlefield Basics
The reason Battlefield 6 has any goodwill at all despite its problems is that it represents a return to what made the series special after the disaster of Battlefield 2042. That game launched in 2021 to critical derision from both reviewers and players, with missing features, poor map design, and a shift toward hero characters that nobody asked for.
Battlefield 6 brings back the classic four-class system: Assault, Engineer, Support, and Recon. Each class has defined roles and equipment loadouts that encourage teamwork. Maps are designed around the large-scale combined arms warfare the series is known for, with infantry, tanks, helicopters, and jets all sharing the battlefield. Destruction is back and looks better than ever, with buildings collapsing realistically and creating new tactical opportunities.
The setting returns to modern combat between 2027 and 2028, featuring a conflict between a fractured NATO and Pax Armata, a private military company. After the future setting of 2042 failed to connect with players, this near-future modern warfare approach feels grounded and familiar in the best way. It’s heavily influenced by Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4, widely considered the series’ peak.
Season 1 Already Launched
DICE wasted no time rolling out post-launch content. Season 1 kicked off on October 28, just 18 days after release, bringing new maps, modes, and weapons through three themed updates spread across November and December. The first phase, Rogue Ops, added the Blackwell Fields map and a new 4v4 mode called Strikepoint. California Resistance arrives November 18 with the Eastwood map and an 8v8 Sabotage mode. Winter Offensive closes out the season on December 9.
Season 1 also includes the heavily anticipated Battle Royale mode, which reportedly shadow-dropped alongside the season launch as a free-to-play standalone experience. This aggressive content schedule shows DICE is committed to supporting the game long-term, potentially addressing Joe’s concerns about future potential.
DICE has also been responsive to feedback, releasing multiple updates addressing performance issues, weapon balance, matchmaking improvements, and vehicle spawn problems. The October 28 update included significant changes to weapon dispersion, visibility, aim assist, and progression based directly on community complaints.
The Metacritic Reality Check
Battlefield 6 currently holds an 83 on Metacritic, which is considered generally favorable. Individual outlet scores range wildly, from IGN’s harsh 5 out of 10 calling it a safe retread, to Generación Xbox’s enthusiastic 95 out of 100 praising its nostalgic action. The disparity in critical reception reflects the game’s dual nature: incredible when judged purely on gameplay, disappointing when considering the complete experience.
Some publications like MonsterVine rated it 4.5 out of 5, calling it the series at its peak. Others like Impulsegamer struggled to score it due to the massive gap between the mediocre campaign and excellent multiplayer. This inconsistency in reviews suggests Battlefield 6 is genuinely divisive, with different critics weighing its strengths and weaknesses very differently.
On community platforms, player sentiment is similarly split. Subreddits like r/Battlefield6 are filled with posts from players genuinely having the most fun they’ve had in a PvP shooter in years, while simultaneously complaining about progression systems and UI choices. The game inspires both passionate defense and legitimate criticism, often from the same people.
Frequently Asked Questions
What score did Angry Joe give Battlefield 6?
Angry Joe gave Battlefield 6 a 6 out of 10 for its current state, but suggested it could reach 7 to 9 out of 10 in the future if DICE continues improving the game with updates and fixes.
Is Battlefield 6 better than Call of Duty Black Ops 6?
According to Angry Joe, no. He scored Black Ops 6 a 7 out of 10, one point higher than Battlefield 6. However, he praised Battlefield 6’s core gameplay as superior, with the lower score coming from issues with progression, UI, and surrounding systems.
Did Battlefield 6 flop commercially?
No. Battlefield 6 sold over 7 million copies in three days and peaked at nearly 750,000 concurrent Steam players. Despite some calling it a flop, the sales numbers indicate commercial success.
Why is Battlefield 6 getting mixed reviews?
Critics agree the core gameplay and combat are excellent, possibly the best in Battlefield history. The mixed reviews stem from frustrating progression systems, difficult weapon unlock challenges, UI problems, and a weak single-player campaign that detract from the overall experience.
Is Battlefield 6 worth buying in 2025?
If you prioritize excellent shooting mechanics and large-scale multiplayer warfare, yes. If you need polished progression systems and quality-of-life features, you might want to wait for updates. Many reviewers suggest the game has strong potential that depends on post-launch support.
What platforms is Battlefield 6 available on?
Battlefield 6 is available on PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, and PC through Steam, Epic Games Store, and EA App. There’s no last-gen console version for PS4 or Xbox One.
Does Battlefield 6 have a battle royale mode?
Yes. A free-to-play Battle Royale mode launched alongside Season 1 on October 28, 2025, available separately from the main game.
Final Thoughts
Angry Joe’s review crystallizes the central paradox of Battlefield 6. How do you rate a game where the most important element, the actual playing of the game, is phenomenal, but almost everything else ranges from mediocre to actively frustrating? The 6 out of 10 score reflects a complete package assessment rather than just the shooting, which makes sense for a review trying to inform potential buyers about the full experience.
For hardcore Battlefield fans who can overlook progression grinding and UI annoyances, Battlefield 6 delivers exactly what they’ve been asking for since Battlefield 4. The return to classic class-based gameplay, massive destructible maps, and intense combined arms warfare feels like a homecoming after years of missteps. When you’re in the middle of a 64-player Conquest match with buildings exploding around you, squads coordinating attacks, and vehicles dueling in the background, Battlefield 6 achieves gaming magic.
The question is whether that magic is enough to overcome the frustration of navigating broken menus, grinding through absurd weapon challenges, and dealing with balance issues that DICE is slowly patching. Joe’s suggestion that the game could eventually reach 7 to 9 out of 10 with continued support is realistic. DICE has shown commitment to fixing problems and adding content at a rapid pace.
Battlefield 6 is simultaneously one of the best shooters of 2025 and a deeply flawed package that prevents itself from reaching its full potential. Whether you consider that a success or failure probably depends on your patience for rough edges and faith in long-term improvement. The foundation is undeniably strong. Now DICE just needs to build something worthy of it.