Just when everyone thought they had Far Cry 7 figured out thanks to a massive leak revealing mission names and screenshots, Andy Robinson stepped in to complicate things. The editor-in-chief at Video Games Chronicle posted on November 13, 2025, that most of the details and assets circulating from the recent Far Cry 7 leak are “muddled, wrong, or from cancelled projects.” This throws a giant question mark over everything people have been discussing for the past few days.
What Robinson Actually Said
Robinson’s statement was brief but devastating for anyone who got excited about the leaked information. He wrote that he understands most of the details and assets people are sharing are either confused, incorrect, or come from versions of Far Cry 7 that Ubisoft no longer plans to release. This is particularly significant because Robinson has proven himself a reliable source for Ubisoft-related news over the years, with industry connections that give him insight into what’s actually happening behind the scenes.
The timing of his comment is important. It came right after a dataminer named AgaiinTx pulled Far Cry 7 assets from XDefiant’s game files and shared mission names, screenshots, and details about an Alaska-based extraction mode. Those leaks spread across Reddit, Twitter, and gaming news sites, with thousands of people discussing what the next Far Cry would look like based on that information. Robinson essentially told everyone to pump the brakes because what they’re seeing might not represent the actual game.
The Confusing Development History
To understand why Robinson’s warning matters, you need to know the messy backstory of Far Cry 7’s development. The project originally started under the codename Talisker as a single game that included both single-player and multiplayer components. As development progressed, the scope of both modes grew so large that Ubisoft decided to split them into two separate projects in early 2023.
The single-player experience became Project Blackbird, which is what people are calling Far Cry 7. The multiplayer component became Project Maverick, described as an extraction-based shooter set in Alaska where players fight each other, wildlife, and harsh environmental conditions. Think Escape from Tarkov meets Far Cry. Both games were supposedly moving forward in parallel with shared technology and assets.
Project Maverick Got Rebooted
Here’s where things get really complicated. In March 2025, reports emerged that Project Maverick had been completely rebooted. According to Tom Henderson at Insider Gaming, the extraction shooter wasn’t meeting Ubisoft’s quality standards and had been struggling with production issues for months. The dedicated tech team called Talisker, which had been supporting both projects, shifted entirely to helping Project Blackbird in late December 2024, essentially abandoning Maverick.
When a game gets rebooted, everything changes. Assets get scrapped, design documents get rewritten, and entire systems get thrown out and rebuilt from scratch. This is crucial context for understanding Robinson’s statement. If the leaked materials include content from Maverick before its reboot, or from early versions of Blackbird that have since changed direction, then those assets don’t represent what players will actually get when the games eventually launch.
What Might Be Real
The problem facing anyone trying to figure out Far Cry 7 is separating the legitimate information from the outdated or cancelled content. Some elements from the leaks probably are accurate. Previous reports from credible sources have consistently mentioned certain details that align with the recent leak, like the Alaska setting for the extraction mode, the use of Ubisoft’s Snowdrop Engine instead of the traditional Dunia Engine, and the general timeframe targeting a 2026 release.
For Project Blackbird specifically, earlier leaks described a story about rescuing a wealthy family kidnapped by a conspiracy cult called the Sons of Truth. The game supposedly features a 72-hour in-game timer equivalent to 24 real-world hours, creating pressure to complete the rescue missions before time runs out. These details came out months before the XDefiant datamine and haven’t been contradicted by Robinson’s statement, suggesting they might still be accurate.
The Mission Names Problem
One of the most exciting parts of the recent leak was the complete list of mission names including locations like the Lincoln Memorial, World Bank, NASA HQ, and Ronald Reagan. These names suggested Far Cry 7 would take place in Washington DC with a politically charged story involving government conspiracies and historical landmarks. It sounded plausible and got people genuinely excited about a bold new direction for the franchise.
But if Robinson is correct that the leaked materials are muddled or from cancelled projects, those mission names might be completely inaccurate. They could be from an earlier version of the game before Ubisoft changed the setting. They might be from a different Far Cry project entirely that never made it past the prototype stage. Or they could be placeholder names that dataminers misinterpreted as final content.
Why This Keeps Happening
Far Cry 7 has become a perfect example of how game leaks can create more confusion than clarity. When development is turbulent with projects getting split, rebooted, and delayed, old assets remain in various places throughout a company’s infrastructure. XDefiant sharing files with Far Cry projects makes sense from a development perspective since they’re both Ubisoft shooters that might share technology or engine components.
Dataminers digging through those shared files find real assets from real Ubisoft projects, but they don’t have the context to know whether those assets represent current plans or abandoned ideas from years ago. Someone finds mission names in the code and assumes they’re from the upcoming game, when in reality they might be from a cancelled pitch that never progressed beyond pre-production.
Ubisoft’s Financial Chaos
The uncertainty around Far Cry 7 is happening during one of the most chaotic periods in Ubisoft’s history. The company just postponed its earnings report 15 minutes before the scheduled investor call and halted all stock trading on November 13, the same day Robinson made his statement about the Far Cry leaks. Ubisoft’s shares have fallen 49 percent year-to-date, and the company is undergoing major restructuring to save at least 100 million euros.
In this environment, game development becomes unpredictable. Projects get delayed not because of creative decisions but because of financial constraints or strategic shifts at the corporate level. Far Cry 7 was originally targeting fall 2025 according to earlier reports, but now it’s been pushed to 2026. Whether the game makes that date depends on factors well beyond the development team’s control.
What to Believe
For fans trying to figure out what Far Cry 7 will actually be, Robinson’s warning suggests a cautious approach. Treat everything from the recent leak as potentially outdated or inaccurate until Ubisoft makes an official announcement. The Washington DC setting, the specific mission names, the screenshots showing particular locations – all of that might be real, or none of it might be real, or some weird combination where certain elements are accurate while others are completely wrong.
The safest bet is to focus on information that has been reported by multiple credible sources over an extended period. The Alaska extraction mode for Project Maverick has been mentioned repeatedly despite the reboot. The conspiracy cult story for Project Blackbird has appeared in multiple reports. The 2026 release window has been confirmed by several insiders including Tom Henderson. These elements have staying power that suggests they’re based on current plans rather than cancelled concepts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Andy Robinson say about the Far Cry 7 leaks?
Andy Robinson, editor-in-chief at Video Games Chronicle, stated on November 13, 2025 that he understands most of the details and assets from the recent Far Cry 7 leak are muddled, wrong, or from cancelled projects, suggesting the information doesn’t represent the actual game.
Why are the Far Cry 7 leaks so confusing?
Far Cry 7 started as one project called Talisker before being split into two games in early 2023 – Project Blackbird and Project Maverick. Maverick was then completely rebooted in early 2025. Leaked assets might be from any of these different versions or cancelled concepts.
What is Project Blackbird?
Project Blackbird is the codename for what’s expected to be Far Cry 7, the single-player mainline entry in the franchise. Earlier reports suggest it features a story about rescuing a kidnapped family from a conspiracy cult with a 72-hour in-game timer.
What is Project Maverick?
Project Maverick is a separate Far Cry extraction shooter set in Alaska that was originally part of Far Cry 7 before being split into its own game. The project was reportedly rebooted in early 2025 after failing to meet quality standards.
Are the Washington DC mission names real?
The leaked mission names referencing Washington DC landmarks like the Lincoln Memorial and World Bank might be from cancelled or outdated versions of the game according to Andy Robinson’s statement. Their accuracy cannot be confirmed.
When will Far Cry 7 actually be released?
Multiple sources including Tom Henderson have reported Far Cry 7 is now targeting a 2026 release after being delayed from the original fall 2025 window. No specific date has been confirmed.
Should we trust any Far Cry 7 leaks?
Information reported by multiple credible industry insiders over extended periods is more likely to be accurate than one-off leaks or datamined assets. Andy Robinson’s warning suggests treating recent leaked materials with significant skepticism until Ubisoft makes official announcements.
Conclusion
Andy Robinson’s intervention serves as a reality check for anyone getting too excited about the recent Far Cry 7 leaks. The combination of split development, project reboots, and Ubisoft’s ongoing corporate chaos has created a situation where even legitimate leaked assets might not reflect what the final games will look like. Until Ubisoft officially announces Far Cry 7 with trailers, screenshots, and confirmed details, everything circulating online should be treated as speculative at best and potentially completely inaccurate at worst. The messy development history means there are probably multiple versions of these games sitting in various stages of completion or cancellation across Ubisoft’s servers, and dataminers have no way of knowing which version they’re actually looking at when they pull files. For now, the smartest approach is waiting for official information rather than building expectations around leaks that might represent games that no longer exist.